SAGE Journal Articles

Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window.

Journal Article Link 7.1: Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance, Security and Social Sorting: Emerging Research Priorities Review. International Criminal Justice, 17(3): 161-170.

Security requirements have been raised to a high level in nation-states around the world following the 9/11 attacks. The resulting increase in routine surveillance of citizens, and especially of travelers, raises questions of sociological interest regarding the intensified means of technology-dependent governance common to many countries. The quality of social existence in a globalizing world is directly affected by the automated identification and social sorting systems proliferating especially at borders but also in everyday life. This article addresses two aspects of post-9/11 security and surveillance: the proliferation of new airport security measures and the emergence of the globalized ID. In both cases, standards are being harmonized such that similar measures are in place at many airports around the world and similar national ID card-and-registry systems are being established, each capable of sharing personal data cross-nationally. Implications for governance in general and civil liberties in particular are explored and critiqued.

  1. Summarize the author’s main point(s) in just a few sentences.
  2. What potential problems does the author not address with his/her own work?
  3. How would you address potential problems and/or future research recommendations that are addressed by the author?
  4. Do you see any evidence of bias in the authors work or writing? If so, what is it and why do you think it is there?
  5. How has this article expanded your knowledge on the subject and/or challenged your preconceptions of the subject?

 

Journal Article Link 7.2: Torres, M. S. Jr.,  Stefkovich, Jacqueline A. (2009). Demographics and Police Involvement: Implications for Student Civil Liberties and Just Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(3): 450-473.

Purpose: A factor largely overlooked amid the press for greater security in schools is the extent to which law enforcement participates in search and seizure and the implications such actions carry for student civil liberties. As case law suggests, police engaged in school searches may be held to the probable cause standard or the more flexible reasonable suspicion standard articulated in New Jersey v. T. L. O. (1985). This article examines the use of law enforcement in schools and whether the probability that student offenses are criminalized increases as a result. Data Collection and Analysis: In this study, researchers report data on 2,270 schools from the School Survey on Crime and Safety made available through the National Center for Education Statistics. Using a factorial ANOVA, researchers use various demographic indicators to measure whether schools ordinarily relying on law enforcement for security report offenses to municipal police to a greater degree than those that do not. Findings: Findings indicate that schools using off-duty law enforcement officers report offenses to the police at a significantly higher rate than those not using off-duty law enforcement officers. While poverty, minority composition, and urbanicity do not interact significantly with off-duty police use, the minority composition of the school and the percentage of students receiving free and reduced-price lunch, when examined as main effects, yield statistically significant differences in the mean percentage of offenses reported to the police. These findings suggest the need for schools to develop clearly articulated policies with respect to police intervention, as well as the need for further research into decision making of principals in schools with greater concentrations of student poverty.

  1. Summarize the author’s main point(s) in just a few sentences.
  2. What potential problems does the author not address with his/her own work?
  3. How would you address potential problems and/or future research recommendations that are addressed by the author?
  4. Do you see any evidence of bias in the authors work or writing? If so, what is it and why do you think it is there?
  5. How has this article expanded your knowledge on the subject and/or challenged your preconceptions of the subject?

 

Journal Article Link 7.3: Visher, C. A. (1992).  Pretrial Drug Testing: Panacea or Pandora's Box? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 521(1): 112-131.

Pretrial drug testing of arrestees and defendants released before trial is increasingly being implemented in state and local criminal justice agencies. The federal courts are also considering whether pretrial drug testing should be initiated in each district. But researchers and policymakers are currently engaged in a vigorous debate about the merits and drawbacks of pretrial drug-testing programs. Critics contend that the programs are difficult to implement, are too expensive, and have little real impact on criminal behavior and illegal drug use. Proponents argue that pretrial drug testing enables criminal justice officials to reliably detect drug use and improve release decisions, to effectively supervise drug-involved offenders before trial, and to encourage these offenders to seek treatment. This article reviews state and local experience with pretrial drug testing, discusses the evaluations that have been conducted, and offers some suggestions as to the role of pretrial drug testing in our nation's drug control policy.

  1. Summarize the author’s main point(s) in just a few sentences.
  2. What potential problems does the author not address with his/her own work?
  3. How would you address potential problems and/or future research recommendations that are addressed by the author?
  4. Do you see any evidence of bias in the authors work or writing? If so, what is it and why do you think it is there?
  5. How has this article expanded your knowledge on the subject and/or challenged your preconceptions of the subject?