SAGE Journal Articles

Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window.

INTRODUCTION TO THE ARTICLES

The study of terrorism and political violence is a challenging field of study that requires experts, students, and members of society to understand the underlying reasons for the growth of terrorist environments, as well as the characteristics of these environments.  Those who examine terrorism must necessarily study data and theories grounded from a variety of disciplines, including political science, conflict resolution, history, psychology, sociology, and the administration of justice.

Societies and the international community are perennially challenged by the problems of dissident and state-sponsored terrorism.  These problems are not new, and have historically posed very serious policy and human challenges for governments and resident populations.  Unfortunately, these are problems that have not been solved, and which continue to be present on a global scale. Political violence is found in many regions, and exists across many ethno-national, religious, and ideological belief systems.  There are no ideal political, national, or social profiles that guarantee immunity from the possibility of being touched by terrorist violence. 

The purpose of this online resource is to stimulate critical discussion about the attributes and idiosyncrasies of terrorism and terrorist environments.  This resource is organized into thematic parts which correspond to the textbook’s chapters.  Articles have been selected from reputable scholarly journals, and additional articles are recommended for further study.

The study of terrorism and political violence is a challenging field of study that requires experts, students, and members of society to understand the underlying reasons for the growth of terrorist environments, as well as the characteristics of these environments.  Those who examine terrorism must necessarily study data and theories grounded from a variety of disciplines, including political science, conflict resolution, history, psychology, sociology, and the administration of justice.

Societies and the international community are perennially challenged by the problems of dissident and state-sponsored terrorism.  These problems are not new, and have historically posed very serious policy and human challenges for governments and resident populations.  Unfortunately, these are problems that have not been solved, and which continue to be present on a global scale. Political violence is found in many regions, and exists across many ethno-national, religious, and ideological belief systems.  There are no ideal political, national, or social profiles that guarantee immunity from the possibility of being touched by terrorist violence. 

The purpose of this online resource is to stimulate critical discussion about the attributes and idiosyncrasies of terrorism and terrorist environments.  This resource is organized into thematic parts which correspond to the textbook’s chapters.  Articles have been selected from reputable scholarly journals, and additional articles are recommended for further study.

TEN CRITICAL THINKING QUESTIONS

  • Does a central cause exist which explains terrorist violence?
  • Is it possible to accurately predict the likelihood of terrorist violence?
  • What are the policy implications of research that indicates an association between political repression and subsequent terrorist violence?
  • Do “hard line” approaches effectively reduce the incidence of terrorism?
  • Are particular socio-economic environments responsible for the formation of terrorist environments?
  • Are innovations such as peace processes effective?
  • How popular is the current “war on terrorism?”  What explains different public opinions in different countries?
  • What are some of the challenges faced by reformers who sincerely seek to redress grievances that are championed by violent extremists?
  • How important are international organizations such as the United Nations for preventing terrorist violence?
  • Has enough research been conducted on the sociological and psychological causes of extremist behavior?

Chapter Six: Terrorism by Dissidents

Enders and Su present a discussion of how terrorist networks inevitably restructure themselves in response to proactive counterterrorist policies.  Margaret Gonzalez-Perez analyzes the roles of women within internationalist and domestic guerrilla organizations.  An interesting comparison of Colombia’s FARC and paramilitaries is presented by Francisco Gutierrez-Sanin.  Mundy examines the politics of naming civil wars and the definitions of civil war.  Raleigh discusses the proliferation of dissident paramilitaries in Africa.  Kevin Siqueira discusses strategic interactions between governments and terrorist groups as they compete for public support.  The article by Eli Somer, et. al., reports qualitative research on the effect of stress on Israeli hospital workers who treat civilian casualties.  Spencer and croucher present a study which tests “spiral of silence” theory as it pertains to ETA in Spain and France.  Anna Lisa Tota presents a cultural discussion of commemorative rituals, using three train bombings as case studies.  West and Orr evaluate the effects of perception and emotion during incidents of urban terrorism.

Enders, Walter and Xuejuan Su.  “Rational Terrorists and Optimal Network Structure.”  In Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51:1 (February 2007).

Gonzalez-Perez, Margaret.  “Guerrilleras in Latin America: Domestic and International Roles.”  In Journal of Peace Research, 43:3 (2006).

Gutierrez-Sanin, Francisco.  “Telling the Difference: Guerrillas and Paramilitaries in the Colombian War.”  In Politics Society, vol. 36 (March 2008).

Mundy, Jacob.  “Deconstructing civil wars: Beyond the New Wars Debate.”  In Security Dialogue, vol. 42 (June 2011).

Raleigh, Clionadh.  “Pragmatic and Promiscuous: Explaining the Rise of Competitive Militias Across Africa.”  In The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58:5 (2014).

Siqueira, Kevin.  “Terrorists Versus the Government: Strategic Interaction, Support, and Sponsorship.”  In Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50:6 (December 2006).

Somer, Eli, Eli Buchbinder, Maya Peled-Avram, and Yael Ben-Yizhack.  “The Stress and Coping of Israeli Emergency Room Social Workers Following Terrorist Attacks.”  In Qualitative Health Research, 14:8 (October 2004).

Spencer, Anthony T. and Stephen M. Croucher.  “Basque Nationalism and the Spiral of Silence: An Analysis of Public Perceptions of ETA in Spain and France.” In  International Communications Gazette, vol. 70 (April 2008).

Tota, Anna Lisa.  “Terrorism and Collective Memories: Comparing Bologna, Naples and Madrid 11 March.”  In International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 46:1-2 (2005).

West, Darrell M. and Marion Orr.  “Managing Citizen Fears: Public Attitudes Toward Urban Terrorism.”  In Urban Affairs Review, 41:1 (September 2005).

Bunn and Wier evaluate the important question of the feasibility of nuclear weapon construction by terrorists.  Charles Curtis addresses the question of whether demand for WMDs can be reduced.  Karen Douglas, et. al. investigated online self-enhancement strategies by White supremacist groups.  Similarly, Margaret Duffy presents an analysis of the online activities of American hate groups, as does Brian Levin in his article.  Iqbal and Zorn examine the political consequences of assassinations of heads of state.  Continuing the thread of discussion on nuclear terrorism, Simon Saradzhyan offers a case study of potential nuclear terrorism in Russia, and in her article Lynne Snowden explores the potentiality that violent extremists will attempt to develop or otherwise obtain nuclear weapons.  Micah Zenko presents an historical review of intelligence estimates of nuclear terrorism.

Bunn, Matthew and Anthony Wier.  “Terrorist Nuclear Weapon Construction: How Difficult?”  In The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607 (September 2006).

Curtis, Charles B.  “Curbing the Demand for Mass Destruction.”  In The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607 (September 2006).

Douglas, Karen M., Craig McGarty, Ana-Maria Bliuc, and Girish Lala.  “Understanding Cyberhate: Social Competition and Social Creativity in Online White Supremacist Groups.”  In Social Science Computer Review, 23:1 (Spring 2005).

Duffy, Margaret E.  “Web of Hate: A Fantasy Theme Analysis of the Rhetorical Vision of Hate Groups Online.”  In Journal of Communication Inquiry, 27:3 (July 2003).

Iqbal, Zaryab and Christopher Zorn.  “The Political Consequences of Assassination.” In  Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 52 (June 2008).

Levin, Brian.  “Cyberhate: A Legal and Historical Analysis of Extremists’ Use of Computer Networks in America.”  In American Behavioral Scientist, 45:6 (February 2002).

Saradzhyan, Simon.  “Russia: Grasping the Reality of Nuclear Terror.”  In The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607 (September 2006).

Snowden, Lynne L.  “How Likely are Terrorists to Use a Nuclear Strategy?”  In American Behavioral Scientist, 46:6 (February 2003).

Zenko, Micah.  “Intelligence Estimates of Nuclear Terrorism.”  In The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 607 (September 2006).