SAGE Journal Articles

Click on the following links. Please note these will open in a new window.

Journal Article 1: Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L. O., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. L. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda Rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Assessment, 10, 359–369.

URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/default+domain/NqMNhi7nA49FqBs6BwEI/full

Abstract: This study examined whether age, IQ, and history of special education predicted Miranda rights comprehension and the self-reported tendency to falsely confess to a crime among 55 delinquent boys. The Miranda Rights Comprehension Instruments–II, a revised version of Grisso’s Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda Rights, were developed for this study and are described in detail in this article. Results revealed that age, IQ, and special education were related to comprehension of Miranda rights. When Miranda comprehension, age, and IQ were simultaneously tested as predictor variables of the self-reported likelihood of false confessions, only age served as an independent predictor. Research and policy implications of this study are presented, and recommendations for use of the original and revised instruments are reviewed.

Journal Article 2: Rogers, R., Henry, S. A., Sharf, A. J., Robinson, E. V., & Williams, M. M. (2016). Dodging self-incriminations: An examination of feigned Miranda abilities on the SAMA. Assessment, 24, 975–986.

URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/stoken/default+domain/J4tdfWHnXmtGmd4kpBKZ/full

Abstract: Forensic assessments must always consider whether examinees are putting forth genuine effort or seeking to feign legally relevant incapacities. Miranda abilities are no exception when a putatively invalid Miranda waiver might result in the full suppression of an outright confession. Using a within-subjects simulation design, jail detainees were administered a representative Miranda warning and two Standardized Assessment of Miranda Abilities (SAMA) measures: Miranda Vocabulary Scale and Miranda Quiz. As expected, detainees have no difficulty in feigning severe deficits in their recall of the Miranda warning and portraying markedly impaired abilities on both SAMA measures. However, using floor-effect detection strategies, several feigning indicators proved effective at identifying likely feigned Miranda abilities. As an ancillary issue, the Inventory of Legal Knowledge was found to be very effective using both the traditional and revised scoring.