Chapter Outlines

Chapter 5: Early Positivism: Biological Theories of Crime

Learning Objectives

Chapter Summary

This chapter discussed the early formation of the Positive School of criminology, which was a giant departure from the Classical School paradigm. The Classical School assumes free will/choice in criminal behavior, whereas the Positive School assumes that free will is not involved at all. Rather, according to the Positive School, our behavior is determined by factors other than free will/choice, such as bad parenting, poverty, and low intelligence. We started this chapter by discussing the earliest positive perspectives, which included craniometry, phrenology, and physiognomy. Thus, the early formation of criminology was largely based on examinations of the skull and brain (e.g., craniometry) in the early 1800s. But these disciplines did not become popular then, because Darwin had not yet presented his theory of evolution. The post-Darwinian explanations of the late 19th century, on the other hand, became very popular, largely because society was ready to accept them.
Once Darwin's theory spread worldwide, the ground was more fertile for a theory of crime that claimed that certain individuals (or groups) were more likely to become criminals, which led to a eugenics movement among both scientists and society as a whole. By far the most notable of these theories are Lombroso's (the Father of Criminology), as well as Goddard's theory of feeble-mindedness and IQ testing. Early policy implications of these perspectives were also examined. These studies ultimately inspired far more focus on the influence of inheritance and genetics in predisposing certain individuals to criminal activity (which we also cover in the next chapter). This was supported by more recent studies on IQ testing and minor physical anomalies (MPAs) that show individuals with low IQ scores and numerous MPAs do indeed engage in more criminal behavior than do their counterparts without MPAs.
Also, this chapter examined the connections between various body types, temperaments, and criminality, with recent research supporting a link between certain body types and criminal behavior. To some extent, these body type theories provide a bridge between the early emphasis on physical features (e.g., skull, stigmata, etc.) and the focus on psychological factors (e.g., temperament, personality). Thus, the body type theories appeared to advance the knowledge in criminological literature by emphasizing more than one dimension. Furthermore, most studies have supported the claim that body type actually does predict criminality, as well as the corresponding temperament or personality associated with certain body types most likely found among delinquents and criminals. However, there are many criticisms of such early Positive School perspectives of crime.

Chapter Outline

Theory

Key Proponents

Factors/Concepts

Key Propositions

Craniometry

 

Phrenology

 

Physiognomy

 

Brain/Skull Size

 

Bumps on Skull

 

Facial/Body Attributes

Larger skull/brain, more superior.

Abnormalities on skull reveal deficiencies.

Certain facial or body features reveal inferiority.

Atavism/Born Criminal

Lombroso

Variety of Stigmata identify "Born Criminals"

Stigmata reveal individuals likely to be born criminals.

IQ Testing/
Feeblemindedness

Binet (Invented)
Goddard (U.S)

IQ identifies who is superior/inferior

Low IQ person's likely criminals.

Body Type

Sheldon

Tissue layer growth in embryonic stage leads to body type

Body type determines personality and behavior.