Chapter Outlines

Chapter 12: Feminist Theories of Crime

Learning Objectives

Summary

            Most scholars contend that feminism has evolved in three major waves. The first wave of feminism started in the mid-1800s when women demanded the right to vote. In 1920, the 19th Amendment to the Constitution was passed giving women the right to vote. With the passage of this Amendment, many of the suffragists believed that women had indeed become men's equal. The second wave of feminism developed in the 1960s when other marginalized groups were also challenging the status quo. Feminists of this wave argued that in order to be fully liberated, women need to have equal access to economic opportunities and sexual freedoms as well as civil liberties. The third wave of feminism evolved around the late 1980s into the 1990s. This wave of feminism is an extension as well as a response to the shortcomings of the second wave. The one major theme of third wave feminism is their willingness to accommodate difference, diversity, and change.
           
            There are various feminist perspectives. The first perspective discusses the traditional or conservative perspective. Daly and Chesney-Lind highlighted key features of this perspective. They maintained the causes of gender inequality are due to biological sex differences. Additionally, the identified the process of how gender is formed. This perspective does not offer any strategies for social change. Liberal feminism (mainstream feminism) is founded on political liberalism, which holds a positive view of human nature as well as the ideals of liberty, equality, justice, dignity, and individual rights. A major feature of liberal feminism is that women should have the same rights and treatment as men. This perspective purports that gender inequality is due to women's blocked opportunities to participate in various aspects of the public sphere such as education, employment, and political activity. There are two types of liberal feminists: classical and welfare. Classical liberal feminists support limited government and a free market as well as political and legal rights. Welfare liberal feminists favor government involvement in providing citizens, particularly underprivileged individuals, with housing, education, health care, and social security. Radical feminism evolved from the women's liberation movement of the 1960s. This perspective emphasizes the importance of personal feelings, experiences, and relationships. The cause of gender inequality is based on the needs or desires of men to control women's sexuality and reproductive potential. Tong identified two types of radical feminism: libertarian and cultural. Radical-libertarian feminists assert that an exclusively feminine gender identity will most often limit a woman's development as a full human person. Radical-cultural feminists argue that women should be strictly female/feminine. Marxist feminism places gender in the context of production methods. The causes of gender inequality are due to hierarchical relations of control with the increase of private property and ownership among men. Socialist feminism attempts to synthesize radical and Marxist feminism. Social feminists focus on gender, class, and racial relations of domination. Postmodern feminism is a more contemporary intellectual movement that has been modified and adapted by feminist theory. This perspective rejects the traditional assumptions about truth and reality; the emphasis is more on the plurality, the diversity, and the multiplicity of women as distinct from men. Additional feminist perspectives include ecofeminism and global and postcolonial feminism. Ecofeminists perceive domination-of women, minority groups, animals, and the earth-as essential problems rather than patriarchy. Global and postcolonial feminism is an international women's movement and is founded in the commonalities of women's lives such as low economic status. This perspective critically explores the impact of development, patriarchal religions, international traffic in women, and the Westernization of the Third World.

            Traditional theories of female crime dichotomized women into "either-or" roles in terms of sexuality. These theories emphasized physiological and psychological explanations to understand female criminality rather than social factors; particular emphasis was placed on stereotypical assumptions of women and sexuality. The primary proponents were Caesar Lombroso, W.I. Thomas, Sigmund Freud, and Otto Pollak.

            The Liberation Thesis, also referred to as the Emancipation Hypothesis, attempts to link the women's liberation movement with female crime rates. While there were various explanations for the changing female crime rates, two predominant explanations were a) the increased opportunities for women to participate in the labor force and thus the increased opportunities to commit certain types of crime; and b) the changing self-concept and identity of women and girls due to the consciousness-raising aspects of the movement. Two often-cited scholars of this perspective are Freda Adler and Rita Simon. It is essential to stress that these perspectives were offered during the second wave of feminism. In her 1975 book Sisters in Crime, Adler argued that as women continue to strive for equality with men, they will also have more opportunities to commit crimes that were previously unavailable to them due to occupational discrimination. In her 1975 book¸ Women and Crime, Rita Simon proposed a similar argument, but suggested that only property crime rates among women would increase due to the women's liberation movement. John Hagan and his colleagues developed the Power-Control Theory incorporating a conflict-oriented theory with social control theory. The power-control theory attempted to explain gender differences in delinquency rates by including family dynamics. Specifically, Hagan argued youths from families characterized as patriarchal revealed greater gender differences in delinquency rates compared to youths from more egalitarian homes.

            Feminist criminology evolved, primarily from liberal feminists, with the realization and objection that gender was essentially ignored and excluded from criminological theory. Klein maintained that three major challenges need to be addressed by feminist criminologists. These include the following: to continue to search for the scientific basis of theories of men's and women's criminal behavior; to reexamine gender and racial/ethnic biases in the social sciences; and to develop a new definition of crime. Daly and Chesney-Lind maintained that feminist theories and research should be incorporated in any criminologist's study of crime. Burgess-Proctor argued that for contemporary third-wave feminist criminologists, it is essential to build on the foundation laid by previous feminist criminologist. She maintained that feminist criminology should incorporate an intersectional framework, informed by multiracial feminism, which includes such defining social characteristics as race, class, gender, sexuality, nationality, and age. One feminist framework that has been used to explore the experiences of women in the criminal justice system is pathways research. This approach attempts to determine life experiences, particularly childhood ones, that place one at risk of offending.

            A number of criticisms concerning feminist theories have been raised by feminist scholars. One such issue that has been raised by feminist scholars is that when conducting research on women, it is essential that one avoids placing these women as either offenders or victims. This has been referred to as the "blurred boundaries" theory of victimization and criminalization. Maher critiqued both traditional and feminist research with respect to the importance of not overemphasizing or ignoring women's agency. The more traditional approach often overlooks the social locations of women's marginalization and places too much emphasis on female offenders as "active subjects" who pursue criminal opportunities. On the other end of the spectrum, more associated with some feminist research, women are denied agency.

            A key aspect to understanding policies based on feminist theories of crime is that some policies are not always directly related to crime. Rather, feminist perspectives also incorporate broader social issues that are connected to criminal behavior. Thus, aspects to policies related to feminist theories of crime are reflected in broader concepts of feminism. For instance, feminist researchers emphasize the importance of reflexivity. This is when research is woman-empowering; this form of research takes women's experiences seriously as well as centers on the idea that "the personal is the political." This term, "the personal is the political" refers to the notion that the "private sphere" is as structured by power relations involving gender, sexuality, race, class, and age as the "public sphere." Another related aspect to feminism is praxis. According to Donovan, praxis does not refer just to consciousness-raising. Rather, praxis also refers to "the development of alternative arrangement that will themselves provide models for change and will in the process change consciousness." Legislative reforms were enacted in an effort to modify state rape statutes. Searles and Berger asserted that the major goals of the legislative reforms included: 1) increasing the reporting of rape and enhancing the prosecution and conviction in rape cases; 2) improving the treatment of rape victims involved in the criminal justice process; 3) achieving comparability between the legal treatment of rape with other violent offenses; 4) prohibiting a broader range of coercive sexual conduct; and 5) expanding the range of persons protected by the law. Four major types of legislative reforms were identified: 1) redefinition of the offense; 2) evidentiary reforms 3) statutory offenses; and 4) penal structure. Another example of how feminist criminologists have informed policies is in the area of "gender-responsive" programming. The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention established a funding opportunity to enhance programs specifically targeted for juvenile girls.

Chapter Outline

Theory

Concepts

Proponents

Key Propositions

Traditional theories of female crime

Dichotomized women into "either/or" roles in terms of sexuality; Femininity; the Cult of True Womanhood; emphasize biological and psychological factors.

Various (e.g., Caesar Lombroso, W.I. Thomas, Sigmund Freud, and Otto Pollak)

Emphasized physiological and psychological explanations to understand female criminality rather than social factors; particular emphasis on stereotypical assumptions of women sexuality.

Liberation Thesis

Increased opportunities for women to participate in the labor force; changing self-concept and identity of women; and liberation movement.

Freda Adler

Rita Simon

As opportunities for women in the legal sphere are enhanced, so will opportunities for women in the illegal sphere; increases in female crime are due to women becoming actively competitive with men.

Power-Control Theory

Family dynamics; patriarchal families; egalitarian families; and social class.

John Hagan, et al.

Youths from patriarchal families have greater gender differences in delinquency rates compared to youths from egalitarian families; individuals experience power relationships in the broader social context, especially those from different social classes.

Feminist Criminology

Gender is not a natural fact, but a complex social, historical, and cultural product, gender relations order social life; gender relations are constructs of masculinity and femininity based on organizing principle of men's superiority; systems of knowledge reflect men's view of the natural and social world; and women should be at the center of intellectual inquiry.

Various

To continue to search for the scientific basis of theories of men's and women's criminal behavior; to reexamine gender and racial/ethnic biases in the social sciences; to develop a new definition of crime; and to recognize the ways in which interesting systems of power and privilege interact on all social-structural levels.