Skip to main content
Home

Primary tabs

  • View
  • My results(active tab)
  • Take

Chapter Quizzes

Rights, Liberties, and Justice

Select a Chapter to start the quiz.

Chapter Quizzes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
You got 0 of 15 possible points.
Your score: 0%

Which of the following statements about jury selection is NOT true?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

Attorneys have an unlimited number of “challenges for cause.”

0

Judges may conduct initial interviews excusing certain classes of people, including felons and the mentally ill.

0

Peremptory challenges require attorneys to state a reason for dismissing a juror.

0
Should have chosen

all of these

0

How has the Court ruled on the right to state-funded counsel for indigent defendants during the appeals process?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

The right extends through the first obligatory appeal but not to discretionary appeals.

0
Should have chosen

The right extends through discretionary appeals, including appeals to the Supreme Court.

0

The right extends to all discretionary appeals except to the U.S. Supreme Court.

0

The right does not extend to any appeals.

0

Gideon v. Wainwright overruled the Supreme Court’s decision in what previous case?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

Powell v. Alabama

0

Argersinger v. Hamlin

0

Johnson v. Zerbst

0

Betts v. Brady

0
Should have chosen

What Amendment contains the Double Jeopardy Clause?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

Fourth

0

Fifth

0
Should have chosen

Sixth

0

Eighth

0

In Salerno the Court ______.

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

denied all bail requests

0

struck the Bail Reform Act that allows judges to deny bail to certain defendants

0

upheld the Bail Reform Act that allows judges to deny bail to certain defendants

0
Should have chosen

ruled that all defendants should be afforded bail in every case

0

The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act was ______.

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

upheld in Felker v. Turpin

0

ruled unconstitutional in Felker v. Turpin

0
Should have chosen

What two justices argued that the death penalty is unconstitutional in all circumstances in their decisions in both Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

Douglas and Stewart

0

Marshall and Stewart

0

Brennan and Marshall

0
Should have chosen

Marshall and Douglas

0

Which statement best describes the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. Alabama (the Scottsboro Boys Case)?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel for every defendant.

0

Unusual circumstances (i.e. capital offenses) necessitate counsel to ensure fairness for the defendants.

0
Should have chosen

The Sixth Amendment does not guarantee defendants the right to counsel.

0

The defendants in Powell v. Alabama received an adequate defense given the circumstances of the crime.

0

Which of the following is a finding of the Baldus study that examined discrepancy in death penalty cases for the McCleskey v. Kemp case?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

The chances of receiving a death sentence were greater for defendants whose victims were white than for defendants whose victims were black.

0

Of the cases studied in which death was imposed, 87 percent involved white victims.

0

Black defendants were more likely than other defendants to receive a death sentence.

0

all of these

0
Should have chosen

Which of the following circumstances did the Supreme Court say violated the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

A judge removed a disruptive and abusive defendant, and the trial proceeded without the accused present.

0

A child witness testified behind a screen so the child would not have to see the defendant.

0
Should have chosen

A child witness testified on a closed circuit television so the child would not have to see the defendant.

0

all of these

0

According to the Court in Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia, what two Amendments in conjunction with each other guarantee the right of the public to attend trials?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

First and Eighth

0

First and Fourteenth

0

Fifth and Eighth

0
Should have chosen

Fifth and Fourteenth

0

Which of the following statements is true?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

A defendant who robs multiple victims at once can be tried in separate trials for robbing each victim until a guilty verdict is reached.

0

Separate governments (including separate states) can prosecute an individual for the same incident if it occurred in multiple jurisdictions.

0
Should have chosen

The government can appeal not guilty verdicts.

0

none of these

0

Which statement best describes U.S. public opinion on the issue of the death penalty?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

The public overwhelmingly supports the death penalty in all cases.

0

The public overwhelmingly disapproves of the death penalty in all cases.

0

The public supports the death penalty in some cases, but tends to oppose the death penalty when the defendant is mentally ill or is a juvenile.

0
Should have chosen

The public is evenly divided over whether the death penalty should exist in any case.

0

What Amendment prohibits excessive bail?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

Fourth

0

Fifth

0

Sixth

0

Eighth

0
Should have chosen

Which of the following statements is NOT true?

Score: 0 of 1
Your answerChoiceCorrect?ScoreCorrect answer

The Supreme Court has ruled that less than unanimous verdicts violate the Sixth Amendment.

0
Should have chosen

The Supreme Court has ruled that juries can be smaller than 12 people.

0

The Supreme Court has ruled that it violates the Constitution to intentionally eliminate prospective jurors based solely on race.

0

The Supreme Court has ruled that it violates the Constitution to intentionally eliminate prospective jurors based solely on gender.

0
Email your quiz result
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  • Copyright Notice
  • Terms of Service
© Copyright 2020 SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.